Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4254
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotelho-Fontela, Sofia-
dc.contributor.authorPaixão, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorPereira-Pinto, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorVaz-Velho, Manuela-
dc.contributor.authorPires, Maria dos Anjos-
dc.contributor.authorPayan-Carreira, Rita-
dc.contributor.authorPatarata, Luís-
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo, José-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, António-
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Alexandra-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T18:22:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-06T18:22:03Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-02-
dc.identifier.citationBotelho-Fontela, S., Paixão, G., Pereira-Pinto, R., Vaz-Velho, M., Pires, M. A., Payan-Carreira, R., Patarata, L., Lorenzo, J., Silva, A., & Esteves, A. (2023). Effect of immunocastration on culled sows: a preliminary study on reproductive tract, carcass traits, and meat quality. Veterinary Sciences, 10(10), Artigo e600. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100600pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2306-7381-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4254-
dc.description.abstractThe Bísaro pig is a Portuguese autochthonous breed greatly appreciated for its meat quality and is mainly reared outdoors. Immunocastration could be a solution to avoid undesirable pregnancies and boar taint in cull sows. The present study tested three immunocastration protocols (with Improvac®) according to their reproductive cycle. The first inoculation was performed two weeks after farrowing (IM1, n = 5), at the beginning of estrus (IM2, n = 5), and one week after the end of estrus (IM3, n = 5), followed by a second administration four weeks apart. A control group (C, n=5)wasalsoincluded inthe samehousingconditions. The sample collection included the reproductive tract for morphometric evaluation, neck fat for the quantification of boar taint compounds, and a portion of the Longissimus thoracis et lumborum for meat quality trait assessment. The reproductive tracts from intact sows (C) were significantly heavier compared to the immunocastrated groups (p < 0.05) (1.403 kg C to 0.508 kg IM1, 0.590 kg IM2, and 0.599 kg IM3), suggesting the regression of the reproductive tract to nonstimulated conditions due to immunization against GnRH. The IM1 group exhibited significantly smaller reproductive tract measurements compared to group C for most of the evaluated segments (p < 0.05). No marked differences were observed in the meat quality traits. Therefore, immunocastration can be used in culling sows to avoid ovarian activity, and it is not detrimental to pork quality traits.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectMeat qualitypt_PT
dc.subjectFemale immunocastrationpt_PT
dc.subjectCulled sowspt_PT
dc.subjectFatty acidspt_PT
dc.titleEffect of immunocastration on culled sows: a preliminary study on reproductive tract, carcass traits, and meat qualitypt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.date.updated2024-11-21T16:29:51Z-
dc.description.version9814-6B05-9C03 | Ricardo Miguel Pereira Pinto-
dc.description.versionN/A-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-3352945-
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPagee600pt_PT
degois.publication.volume10pt_PT
degois.publication.issue10pt_PT
degois.publication.titleVeterinary Sciencespt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vetsci10100600-
Appears in Collections:CISAS - Publicações indexadas à WoS/Scopus
ESTG - Publicações indexadas à WoS/Scopus

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
vetsci-10-00600-v3.pdf697.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.