Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4497
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMata, Fernando-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-21T09:22:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-21T09:22:17Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-18-
dc.identifier.citationMata, F. (2025). Cavy lifespan: survival analysis and lifetables for the pet guinea pig (Cavia porcellus, L.) in Britain. PeerJ Life & Environment, 13, Artigo e19702. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19702pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/4497-
dc.description.abstractIn Britain, an estimated number of 700,000 guinea pigs are currently kept as pets. Despite their widespread presence, research on pet guinea pig survivability remains limited. While demographic studies exist, they primarily focus on morbidity rather than lifespan analysis. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating factors influencing pet guinea pig longevity and constructing life tables, contributing valuable insights into their survival patterns and potential improvements in care practices. The study was conducted using publicly available data from the VetCompass™ UK Program, including 675 guinea pigs receiving veterinary care in the UK in 2019. The survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier models, with lifespan differences tested via the LogRank test. Key predictors included sex, neutering status, and breed classification. The results of the study indicate an average lifespan of the British pet guinea pigs is 4.022 (3.875; 4,170) years; a median survival time of 4.025 95% confidence interval (3.830; 4,290) years; and an interquartile range of (2.563; 5447) years. Unlike other companion animals, no significant differences in longevity were found between sexes, neutering status, or breed (log-rank Mantel-Cox χ2 p > 0.05), suggesting that these factors may play a less critical role in guinea pigs. The findings challenge common assumptions about lifespan determinants in domesticated species. The study also highlights low neutering rates, likely influenced by concerns over surgical risks. Additionally, breed classification remains inconsistent, indicating a possible lack of standardised identification among owners and veterinarians. This study is limited by potential selection bias, lack of environmental and husbandry data, few neutered animals, unclear breeding backgrounds, unaccounted cohort effects, and no geographical analysis of care variation across different regions of Britain.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectGuinea pigpt_PT
dc.subjectCavypt_PT
dc.subjectCavia porcelluspt_PT
dc.subjectSurvival analysispt_PT
dc.subjectLifetablept_PT
dc.subjectAge at deathpt_PT
dc.subjectLifespanpt_PT
dc.subjectPetpt_PT
dc.subjectBritainpt_PT
dc.titleCavy lifespan: survival analysis and lifetables for the pet guinea pig (Cavia porcellus, L.) in Britainpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.date.updated2025-07-18T09:36:42Z-
dc.description.version0F1A-358B-43B5 | Fernando Jorge Ribeiro da Mata-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.slugcv-prod-4533037-
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.firstPagee19702pt_PT
degois.publication.volume13pt_PT
degois.publication.titlePeerJ Life & Environmentpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.19702-
Appears in Collections:CISAS - Publicações indexadas à WoS/Scopus



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.